Search This Blog

Wednesday 12 June 2019

Affinity / sensations -boenninghausan

 Affinity vs sensations
Boenninghousen:

The seat of the disease really makes a part of the former question, but it nevertheless deserves to be more particularly emphasized, as it frequently furnishes a characteristic symptom, since almost every medicine acts more and also more decidedly on certain particular parts of the living organism.

          These differences not only enter into consideration in certain so-called local diseases, but also in those diseases which are called by more general names, as affecting the whole body, e.g., gout and rheumatism.

 For it is probably never or very rarely the case that all parts of the body are affected in the same degree; even if it should be merely the case that the right side is more affected than the left or the reverse.

 But the examination of the parts affected is most necessary and most required when the whole to which they belong is larger, and is described merely in that general way which allopaths seem to delight in.

Such names as headache, eyeache, toothache, colic and the like can in no way contribute to a rational choice of a remedy, not even when also the kind of pain is indicated.

Part affected and side affected is a concrete symptom.

No comments:

Post a Comment

can we prescribe only with single symptoms?

*Single symptom prescribing is gambling* Many remedies he knows only by keynotes.  If these keynotes are used as a reference to ...